Thursday, April 24, 2014

Walden Rhetorical Analysis


Passage (pg) 7

When we consider what, to use the words of the catechism, is the chief end of man, and what are the true necessaries and means of life, it appears as if men had deliberately chosen the common mode of living because they preferred it to any other. Yet they honestly think there is no choice left. But alert and healthy natures remember that the sun rose clear. It is never too late to give up our prejudices. No way of thinking or doing, however ancient, can be trusted without proof. What everybody echoes or in silence passes by as true to-day may turn out to be falsehood to-morrow, mere smoke of opinion, which some had trusted for a cloud that would sprinkle fertilizing rain on their fields. What old people say you cannot do, you try and find that you can.

Rhetorical Analysis

     In today’s societies, it is true that most people take the safe route of life. They get their education, get a job in their field choice, and just live life the way they feel it should be. Then there are a selective few that decide that life just isn’t enough, they actually wanted to live it. So they take risk such as bungee jumping or skydiving. Those are the type of people that Henry David Thoreau would find great interest in because they step out of life’s comfort zone and are truly “awake”. In the passage above, Thoreau’s use of diction and realism further intensifies his strong feelings toward individual’s life styles and how they can enhance them.

      Thoreau switches topics numerous times throughout all of Walden and majority of the time his diction switches with it. In this particular passage, Thoreau, in my opinion has a more excited tone and that reflects his diction. He uses words like “deliberately”, “prejudices”, and “falsehood”. Although those words have negative connotations, I don’t believe that Thoreau’s intentions were to portray anger but more of passion about what he is talking about. He really wanted to get his point across to his audience that just because an idea has not been put into action yet, doesn’t mean it can’t be. Most people are just afraid to try new things due to what their elders instilled in their minds. Thoreau’s diction may be strong but it gets his point across very well.

      Thoreau’s comparison of man and nature is repetitive throughout his entire novel. “But alert and healthy natures remember that the sun rose clear” is an excellent example of how Thoreau intertwine reality with nature. When he says, “alert and healthy natures”, he is really referring to alive and able men that get the most out of life. He really stresses the point that solid proof needs to be present before any individual can say, nothing can be done. The reality is that not many people will take that chance to either find the proof or prove the proof wrong. Thoreau also touches briefly and discreetly on the concept of times. He recognizes that times can change and so can ideas. With time comes advancement and with advancement comes knowledge. That’s what I think Thoreau was getting at when he says that some things may be true now but “falsehood to-morrow”.

        Mankind should never be afraid to take safe risk, especially if it will further enhance their lives. Thoreau was a very strong believer of this concept and displays it consistently throughout his book. His use of diction and realism further demonstrates just how strongly he feels about mankind trying to better themselves without hindrances. This selective passage makes its audience stop and think about how they are living their lives and what they need to do in order to change it.

Thursday, April 3, 2014

Rhetorical Analysis on Bradsher


China’s efforts to join the World Trade Organization (WTO) lasted 15 years. On December 11th, 2001, China officially joined WTO. China “blossomed into the world's greatest exporter and second-biggest importer” (The Economist). Unfortunately, China is no longer very favorable as a member of the WTO due to their high levels of exporting goods and high levels of “essential imputs”. Although China agreed to stop taxing their exports, Bradsher’s use of tone and diction further explains why China only thinks of benefiting themselves when it comes to trading with other countries.  

China is under the accusation that they are using export taxes and quotas to force international chemical companies and other businesses to move their factories to China in order for China to get their hands on more of the rare earth resources. Throughout this article, I found Bradsher’s tone to be very calm towards both China and W.T.O. Bradsher includes multiple references to The Appellate Body and how they felt about W.T.O. handling China violating the free trade rules. They felt the “panel had gone too far” (Bradsher 1) with the way everything was taken into account. On the other hand, Bradsher’s tone remained calm when addressing that China needs W.T.O. in order to get access to the “foreign markets”. Bradsher could have easily made China look needy and desperate but he refrained from doing that. Along with Bradsher’s calm tone he also used calm diction when informing his audience of the issues going on with W.T.O and China.

   When first reading the different vocabulary, you can easily mistake it for negativity. That’s why the tone is so important; it allows the reader to make the diction sound a different way. For instance, “Mr. Bacchus predicted that China” would follow the W.T.O.’s ruling, in which they did. Beijing has a big reputation for “adhering to adverse” W.T.O. decisions. Those two words may sound very serious and scary but they really aren’t, especially if you apply the author’s calm tone. When Bradsher is talking about the rare earth metals, he calls them “crucial”. Crucial has negative connotations to go along with it but the way Bradsher is using it; he is describing the natural source’s importance.  

  Tone and Diction tie very closely with each other. One can actually determine the other and that is exactly what Bradsher did in this article. When it comes to trading, China is only looking out for their best interest. W.T.O. got them to change their policy and follow the free trade rules. Bradsher made sure that he wasn’t leaning in favor of one side but fairly covered the issues on both sides. Bradsher’s tone and diction made it clear of what took place during the trade case with China.

 

WORK CITED

"WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION." WTO. N.p., n.d. Web. 03 Apr. 2014. <http://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/countries_e/china_e.htm>.